Evaluating the performance of a superintendent is a crucial responsibility for school boards. The benefits of a high-quality evaluation process include:
- Accountability – A performance review holds the superintendent accountable for student achievement, district management, and adherence to strategic goals.
- Continuous Improvement – Regular evaluations provide constructive feedback, allowing the superintendent to refine leadership strategies and address areas needing improvement.
- Goal Alignment – The process ensures the superintendent’s actions align with the school board’s objectives, policies, and the community’s expectations.
- Transparency and Public Trust – A well-conducted evaluation fosters trust among stakeholders, including teachers, parents, and community members, by demonstrating responsible governance.
- Data-Driven Decision Making – Evaluations may use measurable data on student performance, district operations, and the effectiveness of initiatives to guide future actions and policy decisions.
- Support and Professional Growth – Constructive evaluations can identify professional development opportunities, ensuring the superintendent remains an effective and visionary leader.
- Enhanced Student Outcomes – By ensuring accountability and effective leadership, superintendent evaluations contribute to improved educational experiences and outcomes for students.
Evaluation Models
WSSDA offers three models for superintendent evaluation: Standards-Based, Outcomes-Based, and Strategic Goal-Centered. Each model is designed to help a school board effectively evaluate their superintendent annually in a consistent and fair way.
Standards-Based
Two or three sentences that characterize this model.
- Framework
- Evidence Template
Outcomes-Based
Two or three sentences that characterize this model.
- Guide
- Academic Competence
- Report Form
Strategic Goal-Centered
Two or three sentences that characterize this model.
- Thing 1
- Thing 2